Drain the Polluted Swamp

I resented Bernie for all the hours I spent on his campaign, just to have him endorse Hildabeast in 2016. But now I’m grateful: if I hadn’t seen the DNC machinery in real time, I wouldn’t have realized the full extent of globalist mind control. Now I don’t just doubt the Democrat narrative on climate change; I know it’s a psyop.

But Trump’s head of EPA said, "I do not believe that climate change is a hoax."

Once you get away from mainstream propaganda, you have to dig for actual source material and question everything. Whom can I trust for non-partisan information? Scientists aren’t reliable; they’re as compromised as politicians. So it’s taken me a while to pass judgment on Trump’s record on the environment.

His “America First” policy can help reduce pollution by luring industry away from unaccountable countries like China, back to where environmental regulations exist.

And the Town Hall last Thursday mentioned the EPA.

"I want to have the cleanest air on the planet. I want to have the most crystal clear, beautiful water on the planet.” ~ POTUS

Source transcript:

TOWN HALL AUDIENCE David Hines of PA: Everyone supports protecting the environment, but the EPA seems too focused on complex regulations, fines, fees, and lawsuits. What can you do to lead the EPA to focus more on proactive compliance, instead of punitive enforcement to protect the environment?

THE PRESIDENT: David, I love the question, because our EPA is much different. We’re very tough, but we get things done and we’re taking regulations off like nobody has ever seen. And I say very simply: I want to have the cleanest air on the planet. I want to have the most crystal clear, beautiful water on the planet. And our conditions now are much better than they were three years ago….

….I was able to get the country going because so many jobs were stopped by not only EPA, so many other agencies, where you’d have to go get 11 different permits for essentially the same thing.

I opened up LNG plants in Louisiana where they were for years — for 10, 12, 14 years and longer — trying to get permits….. I got them built: a 10-billion-dollar plant in Louisiana; the Keystone XL pipeline. ….The Dakota Access Pipeline ….Forty-eight thousand jobs. And…. it’s better than having a train going up and down tracks….. Plenty of bad things happen with those trains. [With pipelines] you’re underground — environmentally better.

Of course Greenies are brainwashed by “alternative” mass media and Hollywood to believe that the planet will be uninhabitable in a couple years due to fossil fuels. So the question for them is: can a thriving modern economy help Mother Nature better than their ideal of a nation of subsistence farms? Their hysterical answer of course is NO, and all Conservatives are pollution who should die of Corona and serve as organic fertilizer. But Greenies stopped reading as soon as I quoted POTUS. So let’s proceed here as if we all want a healthy ecosystem that includes a modern lifestyle.

"We're committed to conserving the majesty of God’s creation and the natural beauty of our world.”~ Trump

Corruption poisons the fruit of any idealistic government policies. Yet, against ruthless opposition, Trump has been keeping his campaign promises. Deep-state criminals tried to overthrow him with the Russia/impeachment hoaxes because he continues to “drain the swamp” by dispersing power away from the federal center, dividing the prize (as it were). Smaller stakes mean thinner fat cats.

Trump's EPA wants states to “assume more active enforcement roles” in pollution control. The buck will stop closer to home when D.C. is removed from local issues. Federal regulations are more convenient for the CIA/Bush/Clinton cabal: they had to install, blackmail or buy off fewer power brokers. I believe their corruption is entrenched down to the municipal level (see: secret societies like Masons). But that’s harder for the crime lords to control in the face of millions of activists like me who are emboldened by Trump’s support. That’s why their cabal calls patriots “deplorable domestic terrorists.” You and I can make the moral choice.

We interrupt this programming for propaganda from a mind-controlled mouthpiece.

“Oregon Wild, rural activists, and other organizations have been monitoring the activities of Timber Unity, an organization that has fomented walkouts and cheered in the collapse of democratic norms, with increasing alarm. A new report documents how militia groups, Alt Right, and dangerous conspiracy theorists have become a mainstream part of Timber Unity, and its leaders have refused to disavow these connections. Even now, Timber Unity members are engaged in xenophobic tirades targeting China and people of Chinese ancestry, and a bullying campaign against the Oregon Food Bank.” 

OMG!!! Vicious patriots are taking food out of the mouths of the poor!!!

Ahem.

Obama had the opportunity to ban Round-Up in 2009. Hillary was a darling of Monsanto, so we’re breaking even with Trump’s decision on glyphosate. [Side note: I know Greenies who use Round-Up themselves, since it’s so effective. I use vinegar/soap and a hoe but I could see the comparatively devastating effects when my neighbor sprayed Round-Up through the fence onto my veggie garden. Trump’s right: build a wall.]

Don’t use Round-Up. Don’t eat GMOs.
End of sermon. 

Obama posed self-righteously on a glacier soon after he okayed drilling for oil in the Arctic. He was the figurehead overseeing EPA disasters and cover-ups. Too many buddies of Obama proved to be criminal frauds who made fortunes while acting as public servants. So one wonders: were his environmental efforts actually money laundering operations to pay off his cabal’s minions?

If melting ice caps cause rising sea levels, why did Obama buy a waterfront mansion? Many a cynic, surveying the Big Picture, might say that Obama is a lying hypocrite because his handlers use climate change to impoverish Western countries in order to usher in their globalist One World government.

Or maybe Obama was just a hapless failure. Yeah, that's it.

Trump has joined the One Trillion Trees Initiative to absorb carbon. Other Republicans are addressing climate concerns from the perspective of free-market principles rather than the bloated government “solutions” that Obama already proved don’t work.

The transition away from Big Gov't unfortunately requires a trade-off of boosting the economy (rather than nature preserves) so we can mount an effective opposition to the depraved billionaires who created the corrupt Swamp.

Anyone who’s been to a third-world country (or a local homeless camp) noticed litter. Uncontrolled sewage seeps into waterways. Poor folk cut down trees for fuel. Deforestation can lead to mudslides and floods. “Bush meat” means people eat wildlife. Poverty is bad for ecosystems.

Are rich women the answer?

Research shows the tremendous contribution women can make for their communities when they’re economically advantaged. That inspired me to start my charity Fanged Wilds and Women Program in 2009. At the time, I was just as hysterical about climate change as Antifa is now. But I wanted a wildlife project that would appeal to Conservatives instead of just preaching to the choir. (I’m tickled that my involvement in politics has exposed more Republicans to the best of ecofeminism.) I proved the feminist research correct: instead of rioting downtown, I was a lady and created a constructive solution. But I might have become an anarchist if I hadn’t been earning a decent living. The strong economy can spawn many dedicated, nature-loving women like me.

For a while, my life was a microcosm of what the globalist cabal and Democrats want: in 2009, after thirty years of absorbing global-warming propaganda, I saw a moral imperative to focus on climate change. I did. My livelihood was no longer my priority. I was willing to end up penniless.

By some miracle, I didn’t go broke. And with Trump as President, our country won’t go broke either!

Now let’s help him conserve the majesty of God’s creation and the natural beauty of our world.

Drain the mainstream-media pollution and Hollywood slime from your brain.

The author VC Bestor is Director of the 
non-profit FangedWilds.org.

"Find the meat of the matter"

V.C Bestor on Twitter

and GAB

Corrupt FBI laugh in our faces

Taxpayers are disgusted (if Twitter comments are any indication) by the failure to prosecute former FBI honcho Andy McCabe. I’m incapable of shrugging injustice off to “trust the plan.” I have faith in Trump but won’t sit around hoping my betters get around to punishing “law enforcement” crimes like McCabe’s.

I brandish my blog.
Take THAT, corrupt swamp slime!

 “The decision not to prosecute Andy McCabe is utterly inexplicable.”

~ POTUS Trump 

Of course, followers of Q Anon (“trust the plan”) say that McCabe’s lying under oath wasn’t worth a fair verdict, since he’s eventually going down for coup sedition once all the elaborate pieces are in place to jail his co-conspirators like Comey and Obama.

Their cabal will be indicted for SpyGate, the Russia hoax, the Ukraine impeachment hoax, 2016 election interference… all those crimes against USA’s democracy… right?

Is the Q perspective "hope porn"?

"The decision not to pursue a false statements rap vs McCabe makes no sense. Even if they calculated a DC jury would acquit, an indictment would have put him under pressure to cooperate in other investigations including the FBI misconduct concerning Carter Page FISAs & Flynn 302s."~ Paul Sperry

I for one will not stop baying for their blood (in my genteel way) till they are pronounced GUILTY!

The author VC Bestor is Director of the non-profit 
FangedWilds.org
a project to encourage women to engage constructively with apex predators.

"Find the meat of the matter"

V.C Bestor on Twitter

LinkedIn and GAB

[Of the 14 Attacks Under Obama, FBI Already Knew Attackers > 12 Times]

FBI's Comey loves him some Clinton

Does FBI create terrorists for job security?

Meanwhile, back in Bohemian Grove...

Who's Accountable for Afghanistan?

UPDATE: Taliban agreed to signing a peace deal with USA to end our 18-year war there.

Opium poppies make heroin, not heroes

Is Trump still in Afghanistan in order to expose and dismantle the CIA’s drug trafficking there?

One of the CIA’s media mouthpieces (nicknamed WaPoo) is pretending to unveil the travesty that is our endless war with Afghanistan. One reason for the CIA cabal’s persecution of Gen. Mike Flynn may be to derail his ability to expose their corruption and war crimes.

“From the ambassadors down to the low level, [they all say] we are doing a great job,” Michael Flynn, a retired three-star Army general, told government interviewers in 2015. “Really? So if we are doing such a great job, why does it feel like we are losing?” 

WaPoo's "Afghanistan Papers" continue:

Upon arrival in Afghanistan, U.S. Army brigade and battalion commanders were given the same basic mission: to protect the population and defeat the enemy, according to Flynn, who served multiple tours in Afghanistan as an intelligence officer.

“So they all went in for whatever their rotation was, nine months or six months, and were given that mission, accepted that mission and executed that mission,” said Flynn, who later briefly served as Trump’s national security adviser, lost his job in a scandal and was convicted of lying to the FBI [in a brazen set-up by CIA bootlicks and their masters!] “Then they all said, when they left, they accomplished that mission. Every single commander. Not one commander is going to leave Afghanistan . . . and say, ‘You know what, we didn’t accomplish our mission.’ ”

He added: “So the next guy that shows up finds it [their area] screwed up . . . and then they come back and go, ‘Man this is really bad.’ ”

What is the smoking gun? An opium pipe:

‘Meanwhile, as U.S. hopes for the Afghan security forces failed to materialize, Afghanistan became the world’s leading source of a growing scourge: opium.

‘The United States has spent about $9 billion to fight the problem over the past 18 years, but Afghan farmers are cultivating more opium poppies than ever. Last year, Afghanistan was responsible for 82 percent of global opium production.’

Decent people see a movie like Air America and think, “The problem’s been exposed, so the wrongdoers will be punished.” The CIA (who probably helped produce the film as a recruitment tool) point to it and say, “Everyone knows about what we do. Obviously it’s no big deal: we keep getting away with it. And if we didn’t traffic Afghan heroin, the Russians would.”

The invasion was a smokescreen. WaPoo’s pretense is that, rather than cashing in on the drug trade, oil and mining, we stayed there on humanitarian grounds:

‘With most speaking on the assumption that their remarks would not become public, U.S. officials acknowledged that their warfighting strategies were fatally flawed and that Washington wasted enormous sums of money trying to remake Afghanistan into a modern nation.

‘The interviews also highlight the U.S. government’s botched attempts to curtail runaway corruption, build a competent Afghan army and police force, and put a dent in Afghanistan’s thriving opium trade.”

LOL. The CIA compromised the military with their own drug trafficking.
This WaPoo article is a threat to frame the military with the whole crime.

Washington Post's impartial "journalists"

…. ‘U.S. officials tried to create — from scratch — a democratic government in Kabul modeled after their own in Washington. It was a foreign concept to the Afghans, who were accustomed to tribalism, monarchism, communism and Islamic law.’

The worst mafia in the world (codename CIA) exploits chaos. Best to feign incompetence and confusion:

“We were devoid of a fundamental understanding of Afghanistan — we didn’t know what we were doing,” Douglas Lute, a three-star Army general who served as the White House’s Afghan war czar during the Bush and Obama administrations, told government interviewers in 2015. He added: “What are we trying to do here? We didn’t have the foggiest notion of what we were undertaking.”

“If the American people knew the magnitude of this dysfunction . . . 2,400 lives lost,” Lute added, blaming the deaths of U.S. military personnel on bureaucratic breakdowns among Congress, the Pentagon and the State Department. “Who will say this was in vain?”

‘Since 2001, more than 775,000 U.S. troops have deployed to Afghanistan, many repeatedly. Of those, 2,300 died there and 20,589 were wounded in action, according to Defense Department figures.

…. ‘spent or appropriated between $934 billion and $978 billion.

‘Those figures do not include money spent [or gained?] by other agencies such as the CIA….’

How can we ever know what the CIA’s balance sheet really looks like? I won’t digress now about the cruel joke that was CIA operative Tim Osman/bin Laden:

“What did we get for this $1 trillion effort? Was it worth $1 trillion?” Jeffrey Eggers, a retired Navy SEAL and White House staffer for Bush and Obama, told government interviewers. He added, “After the killing of Osama bin Laden, I said that Osama was probably laughing in his watery grave considering how much we have spent on Afghanistan.”

Now we get a taste of whom the cabal is setting up as the fall guys:

‘Many aid workers blamed Congress for what they saw as a mindless rush to spend.’

Oh yeah. Congress will be held accountable. Good one. Congress' new Omnibus spending bill allocates $4,199,978,000 in funding to the "Afghanistan Security Forces Fund."

Several of those interviewed described explicit and sustained efforts by the U.S. government to deliberately mislead the public. They said it was common at military headquarters in Kabul — and at the White House — to distort statistics to make it appear the United States was winning the war when that was not the case. …. the head of the federal agency that conducted the interviews, acknowledged to The Post that the documents show “the American people have constantly been lied to.”

By whom? Could the CIA’s mockingbird media have any accountability here? The WaPoo article of course passes the buck, trying to smear Trump with the cabal’s war crimes:

‘As commanders in chief, Bush, Obama and Trump all promised the public the same thing. They would avoid falling into the trap of "nation-building" in Afghanistan.

‘On that score, the presidents failed miserably. The United States has allocated more than $133 billion to build up Afghanistan — more than it spent, adjusted for inflation, to revive the whole of Western Europe with the Marshall Plan after World War II.’ [Never mind Flint, Michigan.]

How much of our tax money, again?

‘One unnamed executive with the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) guessed that 90 percent of what they spent was overkill: “We lost objectivity. We were given money, told to spend it and we did, without reason.”

‘One unidentified contractor told government interviewers he was expected to dole out $3 million daily for projects in a single Afghan district roughly the size of a U.S. county. He once asked a visiting congressman whether the lawmaker could responsibly spend that kind of money back home: “He said hell no. ‘Well, sir, that’s what you just obligated us to spend and I’m doing it for communities that live in mud huts with no windows.’ ”

‘The gusher of aid that Washington spent on Afghanistan also gave rise to historic levels of corruption.’

Sorry to interrupt but I’m sure that historic levels of corruption started when the CIA killed JFK.

[Trump held private meetings with enlisted troops to discuss Afghanistan]

WaPoo's version of the truth can be interesting. I’ll quote extensively* in case, like me, you hesitate to dignify WaPoo with a click:

At the outset, for instance, the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan had a clear, stated objective — to retaliate against al-Qaeda and prevent a repeat of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Yet the interviews show that as the war dragged on, the goals and mission kept changing and a lack of faith in the U.S. strategy took root inside the Pentagon, the White House and the State Department.

Fundamental disagreements went unresolved. Some U.S. officials wanted to use the war to turn Afghanistan into a democracy. Others wanted to transform Afghan culture and elevate women’s rights. Still others wanted to reshape the regional balance of power among Pakistan, India, Iran and Russia.

“With the AfPak strategy there was a present under the Christmas tree for everyone,” an unidentified U.S. official told government interviewers in 2015. “By the time you were finished you had so many priorities and aspirations it was like no strategy at all.”

The Lessons Learned interviews also reveal how U.S. military commanders struggled to articulate who they were fighting, let alone why.

Was al-Qaeda the enemy, or the Taliban? Was Pakistan a friend or an adversary? What about the Islamic State and the bewildering array of foreign jihadists, let alone the warlords on the CIA’s payroll? According to the documents, the U.S. government never settled on an answer.

As a result, in the field, U.S. troops often couldn’t tell friend from foe.

“They thought I was going to come to them with a map to show them where the good guys and bad guys live,” an unnamed former adviser to an Army Special Forces team told government interviewers in 2017. “It took several conversations for them to understand that I did not have that information in my hands. At first, they just kept asking: ‘But who are the bad guys, where are they?’ ”

The view wasn’t any clearer from the Pentagon.

“I have no visibility into who the bad guys are,” Rumsfeld complained in a Sept. 8, 2003, snowflake. “We are woefully deficient in human intelligence.”

Or, rather, they are as dumb as they want to be.



The author VC Bestor is Director of the non-profit
FangedWilds.org
a project to encourage women to engage constructively with apex predators.

"Find the meat of the matter"

V.C Bestor on Twitter

LinkedIn and GAB

* WaPoo pretends to expose the corruption that is their masters’ lifeblood:

"By allowing corruption to fester, U.S. officials told interviewers, they helped destroy the popular legitimacy of the wobbly Afghan government they were fighting to prop up. With judges and police chiefs and bureaucrats extorting bribes, many Afghans soured on democracy and turned to the Taliban to enforce order.

“Our biggest single project, sadly and inadvertently, of course, may have been the development of mass corruption,” Crocker, who served as the top U.S. diplomat in Kabul in 2002 and again from 2011 to 2012, told government interviewers. He added, “Once it gets to the level I saw, when I was out there, it’s somewhere between unbelievably hard and outright impossible to fix it.”

Year after year, U.S. generals have said in public they are making steady progress on the central plank of their strategy: to train a robust Afghan army and national police force that can defend the country without foreign help.

In the Lessons Learned interviews, however, U.S. military trainers described the Afghan security forces as incompetent, unmotivated and rife with deserters. They also accused Afghan commanders of pocketing salaries — paid by U.S. taxpayers — for tens of thousands of “ghost soldiers.”

None expressed confidence that the Afghan army and police could ever fend off, much less defeat, the Taliban on their own. More than 60,000 members of Afghan security forces have been killed, a casualty rate that U.S. commanders have called unsustainable.
One unidentified U.S. soldier said Special Forces teams “hated” the Afghan police whom they trained and worked with, calling them “awful — the bottom of the barrel in the country that is already at the bottom of the barrel.”

Like their cabal uses, for instance, MS13 gang members to do their dirty work in USA, they cultivate the dregs worldwide:

A U.S. military officer estimated that one-third of police recruits were “drug addicts or Taliban.” Yet another called them “stealing fools” who looted so much fuel from U.S. bases that they perpetually smelled of gasoline.

What’s the smoking gun, again?

“We stated that our goal is to establish a ‘flourishing market economy,’ ” said Douglas Lute, the White House’s Afghan war czar from 2007 to 2013. “I thought we should have specified a flourishing drug trade — this is the only part of the market that’s working.”

From the beginning, Washington never really figured out how to incorporate a war on drugs into its war against al-Qaeda. By 2006, U.S. officials feared that narco-traffickers had become stronger than the Afghan government and that money from the drug trade was powering the insurgency.

No single agency or country was in charge of the Afghan drug strategy for the entirety of the war, so the State Department, the DEA, the U.S. military, NATO allies and the Afghan government butted heads constantly.

“It was a dog’s breakfast with no chance of working,” an unnamed former senior British official told government interviewers.

The agencies and allies made things worse by embracing a dysfunctional muddle of programs, according to the interviews.

At first, Afghan poppy farmers were paid by the British to destroy their crops — which only encouraged them to grow more the next season. Later, the U.S. government eradicated poppy fields without compensation — which only infuriated farmers and encouraged them to side with the Taliban.

“It was sad to see so many people behave so stupidly,” one U.S. official told government interviewers.

….

A person identified only as a senior National Security Council official said there was constant pressure from the Obama White House and Pentagon to produce figures to show the troop surge of 2009 to 2011 was working, despite hard evidence to the contrary.

“It was impossible to create good metrics. We tried using troop numbers trained, violence levels, control of territory and none of it painted an accurate picture,” the senior NSC official told government interviewers in 2016. “The metrics were always manipulated for the duration of the war.”

Even when casualty counts and other figures looked bad, the senior NSC official said, the White House and Pentagon would spin them to the point of absurdity. Suicide bombings in Kabul were portrayed as a sign of the Taliban’s desperation, that the insurgents were too weak to engage in direct combat. Meanwhile, a rise in U.S. troop deaths was cited as proof that American forces were taking the fight to the enemy.

“It was their explanations,” the senior NSC official said. “For example, attacks are getting worse? ‘That’s because there are more targets for them to fire at, so more attacks are a false indicator of instability.’ Then, three months later, attacks are still getting worse? ‘It’s because the Taliban are getting desperate, so it’s actually an indicator that we’re winning.’ ”

“And this went on and on for two reasons,” the senior NSC official said, “to make everyone involved look good, and to make it look like the troops and resources were having the kind of effect where removing them would cause the country to deteriorate.”

….

Bob Crowley, the retired Army colonel who served as a counterinsurgency adviser in Afghanistan in 2013 and 2014, told government interviewers that “truth was rarely welcome” at military headquarters in Kabul.

“Bad news was often stifled,” he said. “There was more freedom to share bad news if it was small — we’re running over kids with our MRAPs [armored vehicles] — because those things could be changed with policy directives. But when we tried to air larger strategic concerns about the willingness, capacity or corruption of the Afghan government, it was clear it wasn’t welcome.”

….
Last year, 3,804 Afghan civilians were killed in the war, according to the United Nations. That is the most in one year since the United Nations began tracking casualties a decade ago.

Trump must withdraw the 13,000 U.S. troops who remain in Afghanistan.
But more urgently, he must drain the swamp! He's made a great start by identifying the mockingbird fake-news media as enemy of We the People.

CIA drugs

Update:

Cannibal Chefs?

Explorers “off the map” sometimes resorted to eating their dead or less fortunate companions. New Guinea is famed for a culture of dining on defeated opponents (whose heads they may shrink). And animals of course may avail themselves of any protein. Nature lovers and satanists see cannibalism as the natural order, whether or not they themselves practice it.

Hannibal Lector is fiction’s most famous cannibal; in real life, is it Jeffrey Dahmer? Was he part of a satanic cult? Human sacrifice isn’t just an ancient Aztec ritual but a form of initiation and bonding for secret Illuminati groups hidden in our midst (or on lavish private estates). Look at the Hollywood parties that mimic cannibalism: they easily flaunt an evil truth. How often is “entertainment” what’s termed “predictive programming,” desensitizing and conditioning us to accept using people as food?

[ Katy Perry as meat ]

[Swedish Scientist suggests Eating Human Flesh as Emergency Measure]

[John McAfee brags he ate human flesh]

Lady Gaga with spirit cooker Abramovic

Presenting it as ethically wrong can fit in smoothly with their parallel message that it’s fun and empowering to commit evil. (One attraction of witchcraft is the pretense that you cancel out your evil by balancing it with good deeds and virtue signaling.)

So powerful people end up eating some of us. Climate change may be real but it also may be propaganda to convince us that overpopulation has a Soylent-Green solution. Mainstream and fake-grassroots media are flooded with exhortations to eat a plant-based diet if you care about the planet. Did you get weak and sickly from veganism? Then join the elites who enjoy a sizzling steak that decreases the greenhouse gasses from cow farts. No-one will snitch when you’ve all done it to prove membership in the coteries above the law. Whistleblowers describe infants killed for a black-mass communion host or ritual meal (or for adrenochrome or the rejuvenating effects of youthful blood transfusions).

The cannibal event may seem less repulsive than thrilling if beloved celebrities like Will Ferrell are there.

[ Cannibal Club ] 

...And if the meat is prepared by expert gourmets? Odd circumstances surround the recent deaths of world-famous chefs, who have been feeding the elite. The last couple years, there have been dozens of celebrity chef deaths. Fourteen chefs died in Los Angeles this past year alone, possibly “suicided.” Could Trump’s “draining the swamp” have spurred a flurry of establishment elites eliminating witnesses?

By the way, many celebrity chefs appear to be Masons.

Died a few days later

"Eat People"

Will Ferrell "humor"

Smug Gwen Stefani

For instance, Justin Bull worked as a personal chef to film star Russell Crowe and billionaire James Packer.

Bull’s death follows that of other high profile Australian chefs in 2017: Darren Simpson, aged 39; Jeremy Strode, 53; and Nitai Gordon.

Celebrity chef Gary Rhodes just died in UAE, age 59.

Harry Morton, 38, scion of the Hard Rock Cafe and Morton's Steakhouse.


Food Network’s Carl Ruiz, 44, NY on Sept 21.

Culinary superstar Anthony Bourdain was found dead in 2018, an apparent suicide at 61.

Andrea Zamperoni, 33, Head chef at Grand Central, NY in 2019.

Benoît Violier “suicide” (?) in 2016, a month after the French government named his restaurant the best in the world.

Michael Maroni, Northport’s Maroni Cuisine, 57

Judson Allen, 2018

Homaro “Omar” Cantu in 2015, age 38.

Raccoon meat "roadkill" by chef Cantu

[Ashton Kutcher pedovore joke]

Who knows? But certainly we peons can’t begin to appreciate the exquisite significance of eating someone you love or hate, or an infant whose innocence you symbolically devour. Peasants like us can’t grok such a pleasure. So we’re confined to our Overton window, tossed hints of cannibalism like table scraps so that elites can claim we know about and don’t protest their crimes.

The author VC Bestor not a vegan. She is Director of the non-profit 

FangedWilds.org.

"Find the meat of the matter"

V.C Bestor on Twitter

LinkedIn and GAB

This is on Facebook

"I flew up to San Francisco and covered the John Doe 60 trial. This was not exactly your workaday murder case. It involved the kidnap and cannibalizing of a homeless man by a couple of SF Satanists. One of them had a swastika tattoo on his face. The other, Cliff St. Joseph, was a waiter. Together, they had abducted "John Doe 60," took him to St. Joseph's apartment, strapped him down, pumped him full of Phenobarbitals and proceeded to carve on him all night long. They cut a pentagram into his chest, ate one of his testicles, and tortured him with knives until he bled to death. ....

All of this, of course, was repulsive, led me to ponder how anyone could sink so low as to commit this atrocity. I interviewed the lead witness; a 20-year-old kid named Eddy, over the course of three days. Eddy informed me that there were some 22 members of this satanic cult, including police officers and some very wealthy people living across the Bay. One of the cultists involved with St. Joseph worked for the Bechtel Corp. There were ties to SDI and the Reagan White House." ~ Alex Constantine

Alrighty then

Hoax but still

"The Resistance" to decency

2020 POTUS candidate Buttigieg

Notice the paucity of objections